Pramod Sadashiv Khode v. the State of Maharashtra through Department of Revenue, Mumbai and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fa.442.11
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Civil Application [CAF] No.1299 of 2016 in Civil Application [CAF] No.1298 of 2016 in
First Appeal No.442 of 2011
(Pramod Sadashiv Khode
vs.
The State of Maharashtra, through Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri R.S. Nagpure, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Mrs. Mayuri Deshmukh, A.G.P. for the Non-Applicants/Respondents.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 1 st APRIL, 2016.
For the reasons stated in the application, the
application is allowed condoning the delay.
Civil Application [CAF] No.1298/2016 :
Issue notice to respondent No.4, returnable on 22nd of April, 2016.
Civil Application [CAF] No.1297 of 2016
For the reasons stated in the application, the
application is allowed permitting the appellant to restore the basic claim of appeal to Rs.1,20,47,516/-.
Necessary amendment be carried out within a period
of one week from today and the additional court fee be deposited within the said period.
JUDGE JUDGE
*sdw
Pramod Sadashiv Khode
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court