This court upheld the imposition of costs against the applicant, dismissing the application as devoid of merit and extending the time for depositing the scaled amount.
Time extended by 12 weeks for depositing costs of Rs.10,000/-; application stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6887 OF 2011
IN WP/11418/2010
THE MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BOMBAY
THROUGH SECRETARY
VERSUS
LATA SAKHARAM SANAP AND ANR
Advocate for Applicant :Mr. Kulkarni Mukul S. AGP for Respondents:Mr. V.M. Kagne
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. Date: January 22, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 This Court, while disposing of the writ petition, directed imposition of costs of Rs.10,000/- against MPSC and reasons are recorded for imposition of the costs.
2 We do not find anything irregular or arbitrary in the action of the Court in directing imposition of the costs. The application is devoid of merit and hence stands rejected.
3 Considering the request made, however, time is extended by 12 weeks for depositing the amount of costs and taking further action.
( A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
THE MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BOMBAY THROUGH SECRETARY
LATA SAKHARAM SANAP AND ANR
R. M. BORDE
A. I. S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
