The Company Petition was withdrawn by the applicant, arguing jurisdictional error regarding the Nagpur Bench. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the associated Company Application.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; Company Application disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40.cal.455.2016.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO. 455 OF 2016 IN COMPANY PETITION (L) NO. 44 OF 2016 WITH COMPANY PETITION (L) NO. 44 OF 2016
M/s Bansal Cement Pvt. Ltd. ...Applicant/Petitioner vs Murli Industries Ltd. ...Respondent
Ms Sheetal U. Malvankar for the Petitioner None for the Respondent
CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA J.
AUGUST 10, 2016
P.C. :
At the request of the learned advocate for the Petitioner, the Company Petition is taken on board and disposed of by this order.
2 Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Applicant/ Petitioner states that the registered office of the Respondent Company is in Nagpur, and therefore, this Company Petition ought to have been filed before the Nagpur Bench. In this view of the matter, she seek leave to withdraw the Company Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition before the Nagpur Bench.
Pg 1 of 2
40.cal.455.2016.doc
3 In view of the aforesaid request, the Company Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
4 As the Company Petition itself is withdrawn, nothing survives in the Company Application and the same is disposed of accordingly.
( B. P. COLABAWALLA J. )
Pg 2 of 2
M/s Bansal Cement Pvt. Ltd.
Murli Industries Ltd.
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
