Dilip Maruti Ghodke v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCCA/4155/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The applicant sought to modify an earlier order permitting withdrawal of 25% of deposited funds by submitting a bank guarantee instead of solvent security. The court allowed the request and modified the order.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 27.03.2015 is modified to permit withdrawal of 25% of the deposited amount on furnishing a bank guarantee.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
909.odt
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶3
909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4155 OF 2016
¶4
IN FA/287/2015
¶5
DILIP MARUTI GHODKE
¶6
VERSUS
¶7
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
¶8
...
¶9
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Khandare N. B.
AGP for Respondents State: Mr.M. B. Bharaswadkar
Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr. S. S. Dande
¶10
CORAM: R. M. BORDE &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE:17th June, 2016
¶11
ORDER:
¶12
1. The applicant is seeking modification of the
order dated 27.03.2015, thereby he was permitted to
withdraw 25% amount out of the amount deposited by the
acquiring body on furnishing solvent security. It is
contended that applicant is not in position to furnish
solvent security and he is desirous of furnishing bank
guarantee.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the applicant can withdraw 25% of the deposited amount by furnishing a bank guarantee instead of solvent security.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
DILIP MARUTI GHODKE
- respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram
AI extract
R. M. Borge
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court