Allowed

Pratibha Nagnath Mashalkar and Others v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Its Div. Officer, Latur and Anr.

Bombay HC12 Feb 2016CA/1678/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed applicants to withdraw 50% of enhanced compensation without security and the balance 50% on furnishing security, discharging the existing bank guarantee. Interest on fixed deposit also permitted to be withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw 50% of enhanced compensation without security; balance 50% on furnishing security; discharge and return of bank guarantee; permission to withdraw accrued interest.

Pratibha Nagnath Mashalkar and Others Vs… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

ca1279313.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12793 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1168 OF 2014

M.I.D.C., Latur

Applicant

Versus

Dr.Nagnath s/o Kumarappa Mashalkar, died, through his LRs & another

¶8

Respondents

¶9

Mr.S.B.Bhosale, advocate for applicant. Mr.S.V.Natu, advocate for Respondents No.1a to 1c. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.

¶10

WITH

¶11

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12795 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1167 OF 2014

M.I.D.C., Latur

Applicant

Versus

Trimbak s/o Sangramappa Kadge, died, through his LRs & another

¶16

Respondents

¶17

Mr.S.B.Bhosale, advocate for applicant. Mr.S.V.Natu, advocate for Respondents No.1a to 1c & 2. Mr.B.V.Virdhe, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3.

¶18

WITH

¶19

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12797 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1166 OF 2014

M.I.D.C., Latur

Applicant

Versus

Bharat s/o Trimbak Malwadkar and another

¶24

Respondents

¶25

{2} ca1279313.odt

¶26

Mr.S.B.Bhosale, advocate for applicant. Mr.S.V.Natu, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.

¶27

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & A.I.S.CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 12th February, 2016

¶28

PER COURT:

¶29

Since the directions issued by this Court in respect of deposit of amount are complied with, applications are disposed of.

¶30

A.I.S.CHEEMA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE

¶31

adb/ca1279313

¶32

ca1279313.odt

¶33

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶34

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1678 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1168 OF 2014

¶35

Smt.Pratibha w/o Nagnath Mashalkar and others

¶36

Applicants

¶37

Versus

¶38

M.I.D.C., Latur & another

¶39

Respondents

¶40

Mr.S.V.Natu, advocate for applicants. Mr.S.B.Bhosale, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.

¶41

WITH

¶42

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1679 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1167 OF 2014

¶43

Smt.Shakuntalabai w/o Trimbakappa Kadge & others

¶44

Applicants

¶45

Versus

¶46

M.I.D.C., Latur & another

¶47

Respondents

¶48

Mr.S.V.Natu, advocate for applicants. Mr.S.B.Bhosale, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.B.V.Virdhe, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.

¶49

WITH

¶50

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1511 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1166 OF 2014

¶51

Bharat s/o Trimbak Malwadkar

¶52

Applicant

¶53

Versus

¶54

M.I.D.C., Latur & another

Respondents

ca1279313.odt

{4}

Mr.S.V.Natu, advocate for the applicant. Mr.S.B.Bhosale, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.

¶59

CORAM : R.M.BORDE &

¶60

A.I.S.CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 12th February, 2016

¶61

PER COURT:

¶62

1 Leave to add.

¶63

2 The applicants are seeking withdrawal of amount in accordance with the order passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeals No.13967, 13968 and 13973 of 2015, decided on 30.11.2015. This Court, while passing the order on 30.01.2015, on the Civil Applications tendered by applicants in First Appeals No.1166, 1167 & 1168 of 2014, permitted the applicants to withdraw 50% amount out of the amount deposited by the appellant – acquiring body in this Court. The applicants were permitted to withdraw 25% amount out of the amount deposited by the acquiring body in this Court on furnishing Bank guarantee, whereas, balance 25% amount was permitted to be withdrawn on furnishing undertaking.

¶64

3 In view of the directions issued by the Supreme Court in the appeals referred to above, the applicants are permitted to withdraw 50% of the enhanced compensation granted to the claimants without security, whereas, balance 50% amount is permitted to be withdrawn on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Collector. In this view of the matter, the applicants were permitted to withdraw the balance 50% amount deposited in Fixed Deposit in accordance with the directions issued

¶65

{5}

¶66

ca1279313.odt

¶67

by this Court on 30.01.2015 on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Collector. The Bank guarantee already furnished by the applicants while withdrawing 25% of the amount, in accordance with the order passed by this Court, stands discharged and shall be returned back.

¶68

4 The applicants shall be permitted to withdraw interest accrued on the amount deposited in Fixed Deposit in accordance with the directives issued by the Division Bench of this Court on 30.01.2015 on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

¶69

5 With these directions, Civil Applications stand disposed of.

¶70

A.I.S.CHEEMA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE

¶71

adb/ca1279313

Pratibha Nagnath Mashalkar and Others v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Its Div. Officer, Latur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratibha Nagnath Mashalkar and Others v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Its Div. Officer, Latur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parag Kishor Thakur Vs Public Works Department Ratnagiri Circle through Its Superintending Engineer and Others

Santosh Shivlingappa Mene and Others Vs the Administrator City and Industrial Development Corporation Cidco and Anothers

Sharad Vishnu Gokhale and Anothers Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bharat Trimbak Malwadkar Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr Its Div. Officer, Latur and Anr.

Narharrao Alias Narhari Govindrao Bhoomkar Died Thr Lrs Suresh and Others Vs the Vice Chancellor, Marathwada Agricultural University Parbhani and Anr.

Venkat Shankarrao Jadhav Vs Regional Officer Midc at Latur and Anr.