The Civil Court dismissed an application filed five years unnecessarily delayed after the original writ petition, holding no application survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 13418/11 in WP 4910/11
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVILAPPLICATION NO.13418/2011
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4910/2011
Suresh Prakash Kotumbe.
...Applicant..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri V.R. Bhoomkar, Advocate h/f Shri G.C. Navandar,
Advocate for applicant.
Shri M.B. Bharaswadkar, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3.
.....
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 20.08.2016
ORDER :
The application is filed in the year 2011. The
directions are issued by this Court on 20.7.2011 in the
writ petition thereby directing the respondent no.3 to
consider the applicant's application afresh on merits in
accordance with law and in the light of the Government
resolution dated 16.3.1983 within 12 weeks from the date
of receipt of the application. Five years have passed by
now. Nothing would survive in the present application.
Civil application is disposed of.
ndk/ c2081618.doc
Suresh Prakash Kotumbe
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court