Held that the application seeking recall of the Registrar's order refusing registration of the contempt petition was allowed and the order was quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca11323.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11323 OF 2016 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 3346 OF 2016
Bhapusha s/o Ganpatrao Saknure
.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.L. Bhapkar, advocate for applicant. Mr. S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE &
K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 26th AUGUST, 2016.
PER COURT :
This is an application seeking recall of the order passed by the Registrar refusing registration of the contempt petition.
Heard. For the reasons recorded in the application, application deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. Order passed by the Registrar on 06.06.2016 refusing registration of the contempt petition stands quashed. Contempt petition is restored to its original number. Delay occurred in presenting the application stands condoned.
Petitioner shall remove office objections within a period of four weeks from today. In the event of failure, order passed in the instant civil
ca11323.16.doc
2
application shall be deemed to have been recalled. Civil application stands
disposed of.
( K. K. SONAWANE ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application seeking recall of the order refusing registration of the contempt petition deserves to be allowed.
Bhapusha
The State of Maharashtra
K. K. Sonawane
R. M. Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
