Disposed

M/S v.M.Matere Infrastructures India Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Vishnu Mahadev Matere v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC18 Nov 2016CA/10475/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court modified earlier orders to direct that the petitioner's application be decided by the Special Executive Officer and Member (Technical) instead of the Member Secretary (Technical), a post no longer existing. The petition must be decided within six months.

What did the court decide?

Directions were modified to assign the case to the Special Executive Officer and Member (Technical) for decision within six months.

M/S v.M.Matere Infrastructures India Pvt. Ltd. through… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

CA NO. 10475.16.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10475 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 359 OF 2016.

¶5

M/s. V.M. Matere Infrastructures India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶7

. . .

¶8

Mr. Mukul S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant. Miss S.S. Raut, AGP for respondent No.1.

¶9

Mr. D.P. Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No.5.

¶10

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, & K.K. SONAWANE,JJ.

¶11

DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2016.

¶12

PER COURT:

¶13

According to Mr. Kulkarni, learned counsel, this Court under order dated 11^th April, 2016, had directed the respondent No.2 i.e. Member Secretary ( Technical ) to pass appropriate orders on the application filed by the petitioner dated 9.7.2015 on its own merits. Learned counsel submits that, in fact, the post of Member Secretary (Technical) now does not exist and is replaced by Special Executive Officer and Member (Technical). As such, in the order dated 11^th April, 2016 and as modified vide order dated 15.6.2016, the said application be directed to be decided by the Special Executive Officer and Member (Technical).

¶14

2] Mr. Bakshi, learned counsel submits that the application can be decided by the Member Secretary, who is also an IAS Officer.

¶15

{2} CA NO. 10475.16.odt

¶16

3] It appears that the matter is of a technical nature. Under the Government Resolution dated 11^th August, 2016 and more particularly, clause (4) thereof, the post of Member Secretary (Technical) is replaced by Special Executive Officer and Member (Technical).

¶17

4] In view of the above, the orders dated 11^th April, 2016 and 15.6.2016 are modified to the extent that the application of the petitioner dated 9.7.2015, shall be decided by Special Executive Officer and Member (Technical), as stated in the Government Resolution dated 11^th August, 2016 (page 14). The said application be decided within a period of 6 months from today.

¶18

5] Civil application is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

¶19

[K.K. SONAWANE] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE. JUDGE

¶20

grt/-

M/S v.M.Matere Infrastructures India Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Vishnu Mahadev Matere v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S v.M.Matere Infrastructures India Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Vishnu Mahadev Matere v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Crescent Entertainment and Tourism Ltd., Mumbai through Its Manager Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kshama Renukadas Vaidya and Another Vs Authorized Officer, Idbi Bank Ltd, Mumbai and Others

M/S Vithal Agro Exports Gurme Farm, Thr. Prop. Vishnudas Vitthalrao Gurme Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Shushrusha Heart Care Centre and Specialty Centre, Mumbai Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Surekha Dilip Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Jayabai Narayan Randive Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others