Application for bail was withdrawn by the applicant with leave to file a fresh application after specified prosecution witnesses were examined. The court acceded to this request.
Leave to withdraw the bail application with liberty to file a fresh application after examination of seven witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2_ba_986_2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.986 OF 2016
Rohit Sampat Pawar ...Applicant Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
...
Mr. A.P. Mundergi, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. A.B. Kadam for the Applicant.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent -State.
Mr. Ankush Shivaji Mane, PSI, LCB Pune Rural, present.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.
DATED : 7th OCTOBER, 2016
P. C. :
Mr. Mundergi, the learned senior counsel appearing for the
Petitioner has submitted that the prosecution has not yet examined the material witnesses viz. Tushar Mutke, Dattatray Shantaram Khandebharad, Mahendra Laxmidas Gori, Suhas Madhukar Gaikwad, Amit Bajrang Mane, Deepak Ashok Durgesht, Sachin Namdeo Ghobale.
Megha
1/2
2_ba_986_2016.doc
Suhas Madhukar Gaikwad, Amit Bajrang Mane, Deepak Ashok Durgesht, Sachin Namdeo Ghobale, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Statement is accepted.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
Megha
2/2
Rohit Sampat Pawar
State of Maharashtra
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
