Single judge hearing allowed applicant to withdraw criminal bail application with liberty to file fresh application before the Addl. Sessions Judge at Nashik noting earlier rejections.
Application allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application before Addl. Sessions Judge at Nashik.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA 887-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2016
Sunil Kailash Udavant
..Applicant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra .
..Respondents
Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the Applicant. Mrs.A.A.Mane, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J. DATED : AUGUST 16, 2016. IN CHAMBER
P.C.
who is an accused in Sessions Case No. 293 of 2015 pending on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge No.6 at Nashik for offences under Section 143, 148, 323, 302, 307, 504, 506 IPC r/w. 149 IPC, Section 4 r/w. 25 of Arms Act, and Section 135 of Bombay Police Act. The previous bail application being Criminal Misc. Application No 689 of 2015 filed by the applicant/accused no.6 before the Addl. Sessions Judge 5, Nashik was rejected vide order dated 19.6.2015. The applicant had filed bail application before this Court being
1 of 2
pps
BA 887-16.doc
BA/1415/2015,which was withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application after the evidence of witnesses was recorded.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
2 of 2
pps
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail application should be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application.
Sunil Kailash Udavant
State of Maharashtra
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
