Dismissed
Aakash @ Vikrant Umesh Patil v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCBA/356/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902_ba_356_2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.356 OF 2016
Aakash @ Vikrant Umesh Patil
...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
...
Mr. Murtaza Nazmi i/b. Mr. Subhash Hulyalkar for the Applicant. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent -State. Mr. M.S. Kumbhar, PI, EOW, Pune, is present.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.
DATED : 22nd DECEMBER, 2016
P. C. :
After hearing the application substantially when the
arguments were almost concluded, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file fresh application after further investigation under section 173 (8)of the Code of the Criminal Procedure is completed. Leave with liberty as
prayed for is granted.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
Megha
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aakash @ Vikrant Umesh Patil
The State of Maharashtra
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court