the Petitioner before this Court in the Arbitration Petition, the witness replied (in answer to Questions No. 1 and 5) that he would need to check and come back, indicating thereby that the witness would have to check the records of Citi Bank and then answer the questions. This Petition is on the footing that the witness must be recalled for further cross-examination after giving him opportunity to check the relevant records and then submit answers as indicated by him in his evidence referred to above. No doubt, in the facts of the case recounted above, the cross examiner ought not to have allowed the witness to be discharged, and insisted on answers being given by the witness after checking the record, as suggested by him, but the evidence sought to be led is clearly relevant from the point of view of the controversy in the arbitration reference and in the premises, the recall of the witness for elucidating answers to the unanswered questions is in the interest of justice. The Respondents can, if at all, be very well compensated for the inconvenience caused to them. On this footing, learned Arbitrator has granted leave to the Petitioner to apply to this Court for recall of the witness.
