Faik Mushtaq Karambelkar v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
permission to withdraw the criminal application was granted; the application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 7.cri.appw.380.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 380 OF 2016 IN
CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 2267 OF 2016
Fake Mushtaq Karambelkar .. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Hitesh P. Shah Advocate for Applicant Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 19, 2016
P.C.:
1 Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission
to withdraw this application. Permission granted. Application
is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of accordingly.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
kandarkar
1 of 1
Mushtaq Karambelkar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
Mridula Bhaskar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court