Disposed
Sippy Nirmal Patawari (Intervener) v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPW/355/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appw355
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.355 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2272 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Ms Manjula Rao for the petitioner
Ms Poonam Utekar for the Applicant
Mr.K.V.Saste, APP for the State.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
R.D.DHANUKA,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 2016
P.C.
1The name of the second respondent
is deleted as he is no more.
2Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant-intervenor and the learned
counsel for the writ petitioner. Though
the applicant may not be the first
informant in the FIR subject matter of
challenge in the writ petition, it can
be said that the applicant is a victim
of the alleged offence.
3Accordingly, the applicant is a
proper party to the main writ petition.
Hence, we dispose of the application by
appw355
2
passing the following order:
(I) We direct the writ petitioner to
implead the applicant as party
respondent No.2 to the main writ
petition by carrying out amendment
within a period of two weeks from the
date on which this order is uploaded;
(II) The Advocate for the applicant
takes notice of the writ petition;
(III) We clarify that we have made no
final adjudication on the correctness
of the detailed averments made in this
application;
(IV) Criminal application is disposed
of on above terms.
(R.D.DHANUKA,J)
Appellant
State
A.S.Oka
R.D.Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court