Applicant sought Legal Aid counsel for a pending Writ Petition. Court held that a Legal Aid counsel had already been appointed in a related application, rendering the current application infructuous and disposed of it.
Application disposed as infructuous due to prior appointment of Legal Aid counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5b. cri appw 264-15.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 264 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2298 OF 2015
Pintu @ Laxman Sarjerao Londhe
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
| Ms. Rohini Dandekar | Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant |
|---|---|
| Mr. Arfan Sait | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 20, 2016.
P.C.:
be provided with a counsel from Legal Aid Panel to represent
him in his Writ Petition bearing No. 2298 of 2015.
Application No. 353 of 2016, already a counsel from Legal
Aid Panel has been appointed to represent the applicant in
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
5b. cri appw 264-15.doc
Writ Petition No. 2298 of 2015. Thus, this application has
become infructuous and is disposed of as such.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
Pintu @ Laxman Sarjerao Londhe
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
