In a criminal application preferring a writ petition via jail, the High Court of Bombay appointed a Legal Aid advocate and placed the underlying writ petition for final hearing.
Appointment of Legal Aid advocate Mr. Prosper D'Souza; Writ Petition placed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 3.appw.21.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 21 OF 2016 IN
CRI. W.P.NO. 4400 OF 2015
Shivaji Bhikaji Gawde .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
None for the Petitioner Mrs. U.V.Kejriwal A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : AUGUST 03, 2016
P.C.:
1 The petitioner has preferred this application and Writ Petition No. 4400 of 2015 through jail. In this application, the petitioner has prayed that an advocate be appointed from the Legal Aid Panel. He has also prayed in this application for expeditious hearing of his petition.
2 In view of the prayer of the petitioner, we appoint advocate Mr. Prosper D'Souza who is on the panel of Advocates of the High Court Legal Services Committee, to represent the
1 of 2
jdk 2 3.appw.21.16.doc
petitioner in the Writ Petition and place the Writ Petition for final hearing at the stage of admission.
3 In view of the above, the application is allowed and is disposed of accordingly.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
kandarkar
2 of 2
Shivaji Bhikaji Gawde
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
