Allowed

Ravindra Vinayak Deshmukh and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC1 Oct 2016APPW/171/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-supply of spare copy for service. Court restored the Writ Petition and interim relief, directing the applicant's counsel to supply a spare copy within one month or face dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Allowed Criminal Application; Restored Writ Petition and interim relief; Directed supply of spare copy within one month.

Ravindra Vinayak Deshmukh and Ors. Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

apl-171.15

¶3

sng

¶4

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2015

¶6

¶7

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2958 OF 2013

¶8

Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.

¶9

Shri P.D. Desai for the Applicants. Mrs. S.V. Sonawane, APP for the Respondent No.1.

¶10

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 1ST OCTOBER 2016

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

. Criminal Application filed by the Applicants

¶13

has been dismissed for non-prosecution on the ground of non supply of a spare copy for effecting service of notice to the second Respondent in the Writ Petition.

¶14

In view of the averments made in the

¶15

Application, the Writ Petition deserves to be restored. Accordingly, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to

¶16

 2apl-171.15

¶17

sng

¶18

condition that the Advocate for the Applicants will supply a spare copy for effecting service of notice to the second Respondent in the Writ Petition within a period of one month from today. If spare copy is not supplied within the stipulated time, the Petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.

¶19

The first sentence of Paragraph 3 of the order dated 22nd July 2014 means that the interim relief has been granted in terms of prayer clause (b). Therefore, we restore the interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause (b).

¶20

If spare copy is supplied within the stipulated time, Rule notice be issued to the second Respondent.

Ravindra Vinayak Deshmukh and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Vinayak Deshmukh and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anant Hegde and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Feroz Ali Khan and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Balasaheb Sahebrao Lavate Patil Vs Pandurang Dhondi Jagtap and Anr.

Society for Fast Justice and Anr. Vs the State F Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Smt. Darshana Dattatraya Ghule Vs the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Anr.

Maharashtra Association of Schools of Architecture (Masa) Vs Parvesh Niyantran Samiti and Ors.