This order clarifies that when the main Criminal Revision Application No. 97 of 2015 was dismissed, the associated Criminal Application No. 23 of 2015, disposed of in that order, is held to be dismissed as well.
Criminal Application No. 23 of 2015 held to be dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DSS
criminal application no. 23-15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2015
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 2015
Mr. Gulam Rasool Abdul Gani Shaikh .. Petitioner vs. Mrs. Shahnaz Bi. Bulam R. Sahikh and anr. .. Respondents
None for both the parties.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 26 AUGUST 2016.
P.C. :-
1] In the order dated 20 August 2016, dismissed Criminal Revision Application No. 97 of 2015, it is not specifically mentioned that Criminal Application No. 23 of 2015 made therein stands disposed of.
2] Accordingly, since the main Criminal Revision Application No.
97 of 2011 stands dismissed, it is clarified that even Criminal Application No. 23 of 2015 made therein, does not survive and stands dismissed.
3] The order dated 20 August 2016 may be construed accordingly.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
1/1
Mr. Gulam Rasool Abdul Gani Shaikh
Mrs. Shahnaz Bi. Bulam R. Sahikh
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
