The Court allowed the application and directed the State to defreeze 14 accounts previously mentioned in a related order quashing an FIR before disposing of the matter.
Direction to defreeze 14 accounts mentioned in Exhibit 'B'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-APL-242-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.242 OF 2016
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.520 OF 2015
Gopal Amar Thakur and Others ..Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. A.V.Chatuphale with Ms. R.W.Correia, Advocates for the Applicants.
Ms. U.V.Kejriwal , APP for the State. Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal, Advocate for Respondent No.2
Coram : SHANTANU KEMKAR & RANJIT MORE, JJ.
Date : 2nd May, 2016.
P. C. :
As a consequence of the order passed in Criminal Application No.520 of 2015 quashing the F.I.R., we allow this application and direct Respondent No.1 to defreeze 14 accounts mentioned in Exhibit 'B' of this Application.
2 Subject to above, the criminal application stands disposed of.
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]
1/1
Shivgan
Gopal Amar Thakur and Others
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
