Disposed
Suo Motu (Courts on Its Own) v. the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Health Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others
Bombay HCAPPP/1351/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23.3CRPIL.4.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL P.I.L. NO. 4 OF 2015.
(Suo Motu – Court on its own motion vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. Shashibhushan Wahane, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) for petitioner,
Mr. D.P. Thakare, A.P.P. for respondent nos.1,3,4 & 7, Mr. S.M. Puranik, Advocate for respondent no.2, Mr. R.O. Chhabra, Advocate for respondent no.5, Mr. P.C. Madkholkar, Advocate for Intervenor.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 23, 2016.
Two weeks' time is granted by way of last chance to file reply. We make it clear that if the reply is not filed by the next date, we will consider summoning the presence of the Commissioner of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation.
S.O. to 6.4.2016.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) NO. 1351 OF 2015 :
For the reasons stated, the application is allowed.
The applicant is permitted to be joined as party respondent.
The applicant/respondent would be at liberty to file affidavit-in-reply.
Judge
Judge
J.
State of Maharashtra
B.R. GAVAI
A.S. CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court