Order disposing of a criminal application for cancellation of bail as infructuous after the prosecution sanction was refused by the State of Maharashtra.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cr. Appln. 933/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 933 OF 2014
Vijayanand S/o Balasaheb Deshmukh
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra& ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. H.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. U.S. Mote, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
Mr. D.J. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent no.3
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 21/04/2016
ORAL ORDER:
Heard.
2.Learned counsel for the applicant files on
record the order dated 05/04/2014 of the State of
Maharashtra, refusing to grant sanction to prosecute
the respondent no.3. The same is accepted on record
and marked as "X" for the purpose of identification.
Learned counsel for the applicant therefore submits
that the present application for cancellation of bail
granted to respondent no.3 has become infructuous.
2 Cr. Appln. 933/2014
3. In the circumstances, the application is
disposed of as infructuous.
[M.T. JOSHI]
JUDGE
arp/
Vijayanand S/o Balasaheb Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent no.3
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court