Criminal Appeal against bail order rejected as case not fit for bail due to direct evidence of victim. Paper book directed to be prepared within six weeks for final listing.
Application rejected; paper book directed to be prepared within six weeks; appeal listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.Appln. 809/16 in Cr.Appeal (St) 61/16
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.809/2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (St.) NO.61/2016
Kadar Lalkha Tadvi.
...Applicant..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.
...Respondent...
.....
Shri Girish Nagori, Advocate for applicant.
Shri S.J. Salgare, APP for respondent.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
K.L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE: 31.03.2016
ORDER :
We have perused the judgment and order passed by the
trial Court. According to us, this is not a fit case for
enlarging the accused on bail since there is a direct
evidence of the victim in respect of the burn injuries
sustained by her at the instance of the accused. The
application, being devoid of substance, stands rejected.
However, office is directed to ensure preparation of the
paper book within six weeks from today. After
preparation of the paper book, the appeal be listed for
final hearing.
(K.L. WADANE, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.) ndk/ cr3131616.doc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this is a fit case for enlarging the accused on bail given direct evidence of victim regarding injuries.
Kadar Lalkha Tadvi
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court