Applicants sought permission to withdraw a criminal application to contest the trial. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; applicants to contest the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra687.06
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.687 OF 2006
1) Nitesh s/o Baburao Pawar,
2) Shaikh Mohammad Mustaq
...APPLICANTS
VERSUS
1) The State of Maharashtra,
2) Mrs. Pushpamala w/o Gopinath Nalawade
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr. S.M. Godsay Advocate for Applicants.
Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 6TH OCTOBER, 2016
ORDER :
1.Learned counsel appearing for the
Applicants informs this Court that charge is
already framed before the trial Court. In that
cra687.06
2
view of the matter, without entering into the
merits of the Application, the counsel seeks
permission to withdraw this Application so as to
contest the trial.
2.In that view of the matter, the
Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/OCT16
Nitesh s/o Baburao Pawar
Shaikh Mohammad Mustaq
The State of Maharashtra
Mrs. Pushpamala w/o Gopinath Nalawade
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court