Dismissed
Suman Pradut Nag v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/6702/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6702 OF 2016
SUMAN PRADUT NAAG VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Advocate for Applicant : Mr Salunke Sudarshan J APP for Respondents: Mr P G Borade
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: December 14, 2016
PER COURT :-
Report. Prima facie, the ingredients of the alleged offences are disclosed. First Information Report needs investigation. No case is made out for quashing the First Information Report. Hence, criminal application stands rejected.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
aaa/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report should be quashed based on prima facie revelations of alleged offences.
SUMAN PRADUT NAAG
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court