Dismissed
Vinod S/O Sanjay Athawale and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/5126/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran5126.16
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5126 OF 2016
VINOD S/O SANJAY ATHAWALE AND ANR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Kulkarni Ramesh C. APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. D.R. Kale Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. G.R. Syed
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE AND
V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED: 21st NOVEMBER, 2016
P.C. :-
Heard. Perused the evidence on record. In the light of investigation papers and the contents of messages sent by the applicants, prima facie , the ingredients of alleged offences are spelt out. No case is made out to quash the F.I.R.. Hence, application stands rejected.
( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. S. SHINDE, J. )
rlj/
VINOD S/O SANJAY ATHAWALE AND ANR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
S. S. SHINDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court