On an application seeking permission to withdraw, the Court disposed of the criminal application as withdrawn on instructions to the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Application No. 5009 of 2016
District : Nanded
Manoj s/o. Mukinda Kirtane,
Age : 45 years,
Occupation : Agriculture,
R/o. Dattamanjri,.. Applicant.
Taluka : Mahur, (Original accused
District : Nanded. no.1)
versus
The State of Maharashtra... Respondent.
............
Mr. Ravindra B. Ade, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for the respondent.
............
CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.
DATE : 19TH OCTOBER 2016
ORAL ORDER:
The learned Counsel appearing for the
applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to
withdraw the Application.
2.The Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
( A.M. BADAR )
JUDGE
puranik / CRIAPPLN5009.16
Manoj s/o. Mukinda Kirtane
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court