The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed an application seeking to quash an FIR, holding that the allegations disclosed the ingredients of an offence requiring investigation, thus no case for quashing was made out.
None granted; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra4853.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4853 OF 2016
Irfan s/o Abdul Aleem Shaikh
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
1) The State of Maharashtra,
2) Rahul s/o Ramdev Biyani
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.H.I. Pathan Advocate for Applicant.
Mr.S.Y. Mahajan, Addl. P.P. for Respondent No.1.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 6TH DECEMBER, 2016
ORDER :
1.Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Applicant.
2.Upon reading allegations in the F.I.R.,
we are of the prima facie opinion that ingredients
cra4853.16
2
of alleged offence have been disclosed, which
needs investigation. No case is made out for
quashing the F.I.R. The Application is dismissed.
[K.K. SONAWANE, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/DEC16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR needs to be quashed based on the allegations disclosed therein.
Irfan s/o Abdul Aleem Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Rahul s/o Ramdev Biyani
S.S. SHINDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court