Application dismissed due to lack of instructions from applicants following non-response to Advocate, resulting in discharge of rule without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl2850
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2850 OF 2008
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Shailesh Kharat i/b Mr.Aabad H.H.Ponda for the
Applicants
Ms M.H.Mhatre, APP for the Respondent No.1
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
R.D.DHANUKA,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 2016
P.C.
1The learned counsel for the
applicants states that notwithstanding
the letters sent by the Advocate for
the applicants, there is no response
from the applicants and therefore, he
has no instructions to proceed.
Accordingly, we dismiss the application
for non prosecution. Rule is discharged
with no order as to costs.
(R.D.DHANUKA,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Applicants
Respondent No.1
A.S.Oka
R.D.Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court