Dismissed
Dhiraj Shankar Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPLN/234/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criapln233-2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 233 OF 2016
(Ajay Dinkar More Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 234 OF 2016
(Dhiraj Shankar Shinde Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 235 OF 2016
(Parag Machindra Patare Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
Mr. K.B. Autade, Advocate holding for Mr. N.P. Ghanwat,
Advocate for the applicants in all the applications
Mr. D.R. Adhav, Advocate to assist the A.P.P.
Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 12/04/2016
ORAL ORDER:
1.Before the hearing in the matters could start,
learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions of
the applicants, submitted that since the learned
Sessions Judge has reported that the trial would be
concluded within a period of four months, the applicants
wish to withdraw the present applications with liberty
to file similar applications after a period of four
months.
criapln233-2016
2
2.Accordingly, all the present three applications
are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[M.T. JOSHI]
JUDGE
npj/criapln233-2016
Ajay Dinkar More
Dhiraj Shankar Shinde
Parag Machindra Patare
The State of Maharashtra
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court