The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the applicant to withdraw the criminal reference and disposed of the proceedings accordingly.
Allowed withdrawal of the application and disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2257 OF 2016
Rahul S/o Dnyanoba Jadhawar.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.. Respondent
Mr. S.B. Solanke, Advocate h/f Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate
for the applicant
Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 20/04/2016
ORAL ORDER :
Heard.
2.Learnedcounselfortheapplicant,
on instructions, submits that the applicant wishes to
withdraw the application.
3. Allowed to withdraw and disposed off as such.
[M.T. JOSHI] JUDGE
arp/
Rahul S/o Dnyanoba Jadhawar
The State of Maharashtra
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court