Allowed an application permitting the applicant to assist the Additional Public Prosecutor during the hearing of a related criminal application without quoting section or judicial precedent details.
Permitted the applicant through his counsel to assist the A.P.P. during the hearing of Cri. Application No. 1858/2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criapln2158-2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2158 OF 2016
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1858 OF 2016
(Satish Maruti Chavan Vs. Gajanan Balbhim Chavan and
another)
Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 13/04/2016
ORAL ORDER:
1. Heard.
2.For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed. The applicant through his counsel is
permitted to assist the A.P.P. during hearing of Cri.
Application No. 1858/2016. The present application is
accordingly allowed and disposed of.
[M.T. JOSHI]
JUDGE
npj/criapln2158-2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is permitted to assist the A.P.P. during the hearing of Cri. Application No. 1858/2016.
Satish Maruti Chavan
Gajanan Balbhim Chavan
State
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court