Allowed

Dhananjay S/O Bhausaheb Jogas v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC16 Apr 2016APPLN/2136/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed bail applications for two applicants charged with attempted murder and related offences under the IPC, granting release on personal and surety bonds with attendance conditions for investigation.

What did the court decide?

Release of both applicants on bail on personal bond of Rs. 15,000 and surety in like amount; attendance every second and fourth Tuesday for four months for investigation.

Dhananjay S/O Bhausaheb Jogas Vs the State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

criapln2136-1976-2016

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2136 OF 2016

¶5

Dhananjay s/o Bhausaheb Jogas,
Age : 20 years, Occu. Student,
R/o A/o Narala, Tq. Paithan,
District Aurangabad

¶6

APPLICANT

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

The State of Maharashtra,
through the Police Inspector,
Mukundwadi Police Station,
Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad

¶9

RESPONDENT

¶10

AND

¶11

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1976 OF 2016

¶12

Gajanan Harikishor Babirwal,
Age : 20 years, Occu. Education,
R/o Vijaynagar, Lane No. 3,
Garkheda Parisar, Aurangabad

¶13

APPLICANT

¶14

VERSUS

¶15

The State of Maharashtra,
at the instance of Mukundwadi
Police Station

¶16

RESPONDENT

¶17

Mr. Suresh W. Munde, Advocate for the applicant
in Criminal Application No. 2136/2016
Mr. Abhaysinh K. Bhosale, Advocate for the
applicant in Criminal Application No. 1976/2016
Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State

¶18

 CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
 DATE : 16/04/2016

¶19

criapln2136-1976-2016

¶20

¶21

ORAL ORDER :

¶22

1. Heard both sides.

¶23

2.In Criminal Application No. 2136/2016,

¶24

applicant Dhananjay is seeking anticipatory bail while
in Criminal Application No. 1976/2016, applicant Gajanan
is seeking regular bail, in Crime No. 0177/2016,
registered with Mukundwadi Police Station, District
Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under section
307, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149 read with section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code.

¶25

3.The complaint of the victim of the offence

¶26

would show that while other named accused had assaulted
him and his brother with knife, the present applicants
alongwith other twelve named and 2 to 3 un-named
accused had abused and manhandled the complainant and
his brother as a precursor to the incident of stabbing
by the other named accused.

¶27

4.Upon hearing both sides and considering the
nature of the injuries suffered by the complainant and

¶28

his brother and finding the role attributed to the
present applicants, in my view, both the applications

¶29

criapln2136-1976-2016

¶30

¶31

need to be allowed. In the circumstances, the following
order:-

¶32

5.In the event of arrest of applicant in Criminal
Application No. 2136/2016, namely, Dhananjay s/o
Bhausaheb Jogas, in Crime No. 177/2016, registered with
Mukundwadi Police Station, District Aurangabad for the
offences punishable under section 307, 143, 144, 147,
148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, he be released on
bail on his executing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.
15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand) and also upon
furnishing surety in the like amount.

¶33

6.The applicant – Gajanan Harikishor Babirwal be
released on bail in Crime No. 177/2016, registered with
Mukundwadi Police Station, District Aurangabad for the
offences punishable under section 307, 143, 144, 147,
148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, on his executing P.R.
bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- (rupees fifteen
thousand) and also upon furnishing surety in the like
amount.

¶34

7.Both the applicants shall attend the

¶35

investigating officer/concerned police station, for the

¶36

4 criapln2136-1976-2016

¶37

purpose of investigation/interrogation, on every second

¶38

and fourth Tuesday between 09.00 a.m. and 10.00 a.m. for
a period of four months i.e. in case of applicant
Dhananjay Bhausaheb Jogas from fourth Tuesday of April,
2016 and in case of applicant Gajanan Harikishor
Babirwal, from succeeding Tuesday after his release on
bail.

¶39

8.Both the applications are accordingly allowed

¶40

and disposed of.

¶41

[M.T. JOSHI]
 JUDGE

¶42

npj/criapln2136-1976-2016

Dhananjay S/O Bhausaheb Jogas v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay S/O Bhausaheb Jogas v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok S/O. Anaji Wakchaure Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Sandhya W/O Sharadchandra Deshpande and Other

Sayyed Matin S/O Sayyed Rasool Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mohammad Mehboob Rafique Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mohammad Mehboob Rafique Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ganesh S/O. Sahebrao Matade Vs the State of Maharashtra