Vijay Rangnath Shinde. v. the State of Maharashtra.
Bombay HCAPPLN/1632/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
criapln1632-2016
¶2
1
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶4
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1632 OF 2016
(Vijay RAngnath Shinde Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
¶5
Mr. V.B. Jogdand-Patil, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
¶6
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 21/04/2016
¶7
ORAL ORDER:
¶8
1. Heard.
¶9
2. Upon hearing, learned counsel for the
¶10
applicant, on instructions of the applicant, submits
that the applicant wishes to withdraw the present
application. However, liberty to file similar
application in the trial court after the chargesheet is
filed, may be granted.
¶11
2. Accordingly, the present application is allowed
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Vijay RAngnath Shinde
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
M.T. Joshi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court