Dismissed
Shrimant Baburao Deokar v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/1149/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra1149.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1149 OF 2016
Shrimant Baburao Deokar
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
1) The State of Maharashtra,
2) Kisan s/o Vithal Gaikwad
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.A.S. Kale Advocate h/f. Mr. S.B.
Talekar Advocate for Applicant.
Ms.P.V. Diggikar, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 24TH OCTOBER, 2016
ORDER :
. Learned counsel appearing for the
Applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to
withdraw this Application with liberty to take out
appropriate application in the event the charge-
cra1149.16
2
sheet is filed by the Investigating Officer.
2.The Application is disposed of as
withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/OCT16
Shrimant Baburao Deokar
The State of Maharashtra
Kisan s/o Vithal Gaikwad
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court