Amol S/O. Bhausaheb Kardile v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criapln1126-2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1126 OF 2016
(Amol s/o Bhausaheb Kardile Vs. The State of
Maharashtra)
Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 21/04/2016
ORAL ORDER:
1. Heard.
2.Upon hearing, learned counsel for the
applicant, on instructions of the applicant, submits
that the applicant wishes to withdraw the present
application. However, liberty to file similar
application in case the trial is not concluded within a
period of six months, may be granted.
2. Accordingly, the present application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for and disposed of as such.
[M.T. JOSHI]
JUDGE
npj/criapln1126-2016
Amol s/o Bhausaheb Kardile
The State of Maharashtra
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court