Disposed
Umakant Pandit Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/1075/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Ordered to be disposed of by both sides to contest the B Summary Report.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra1075.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1075 OF 2016
Umakant Pandit Patil
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
1) The State of Maharashtra,
2) Anil Ramkrushn Patil
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.M.V. Bhamre Advocate for Applicant.
Mr.S.G. Karlekar, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1.
Mr.Prakashsing B. Patil Advocate for Respondent
No.2.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 30TH NOVEMBER, 2016
ORDER :
1.The learned A.P.P. appearing for the
State, on instructions, submits that "B" Summary
Report, is filed before the concerned Court.
cra1075.16
2
2.In that view of the matter, leaving open
to the parties to contest the said "B" Summary
report, this Application stands disposed of.
[K.K. SONAWANE, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/NOV16
Umakant Pandit Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Anil Ramkrushn Patil
S.S. SHINDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court