The Single Judge rejected applicant Ismail Shaikh's application under Section 439(2) CrPC seeking cancellation of bail. The court held no case for interference based on the Sessions Court's consideration of medical report intricacies.
Application for cancellation of bail was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criap1044.15
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1044 OF 2015
Ismail s/o Anwar Shaikh
..APPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for applicant; Mr M.M. Nerlikar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent no.1; Mr Yunus B. Pathan, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 5th January, 2016
ORDER :
By the present application under section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant seeks cancellation of bail granted to respondent no. 1 by Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, vide order dated 7th November, 2014, passed below Exh. 46 in Sessions Case No. 52 of 2014.
criap1044.15
amj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the Additional Sessions Judge's order granting bail for lack of female examination of victim in medical report.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ismail Shaikh
State of Mah.
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
