This order expedites the hearing of two criminal appeals pending against applicants in custody since 2008. The High Court placed the appeals for final hearing in early October 2016 and dismissed the applications.
Applications for expeditious hearing allowed; appeals placed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
appa.991.2016+_9.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.991 OF 2016 IN CRIINAL APEPAL NO.142 OF 2015
Sajid Abdul Latif khan @ Sajid Awali ... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.992 OF 2016 IN CRIINAL APEPAL NO.128 OF 2012
Noor Mohammad Sayad Mohd. Pathan ... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mrs.Nasreen S.K. Ayubi, advocate appointed for the Applicants Ms.V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP, for Respondent - State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, ACG. CJ. & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
DATE: AUGUST 19, 2016
P.C.:
1 / 2
appa.991.2016+_9.doc
be placed on the final hearing Board in the week commencing from 3.10.2016.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 / 2
Sajid Abdul Latif khan @ Sajid Awali
Noor Mohammad Sayad Mohd. Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
