In a criminal appeal under Section 372 CrPC, the Bombay High Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the applicant, who was imprisoned, allowing the appeal to proceed.
Delay in filing the appeal is condoned; application is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6a. cri appa 785-16.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 785 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 459 OF 2016
Lalita Parshuram Vitkar
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
Ms. Sarojini Upadhyay Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant Mrs. U.V.Kejriwal APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : JULY 7, 2016.
P.C.:
2. This is an application for condonation of delay caused in filing the appeal.
3. Looking to the fact that the application and the appeal
have been preferred through jail and the other facts and
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
6a. cri appa 785-16.doc
circumstances of this case, we are of the opinion that in the interest of justice, delay deserves to be condoned.
Accordingly delay is condoned.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the criminal appeal under Section 372 CrPC should be condoned considering the appellant was in jail.
Lalita Parshuram Vitkar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhalker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
