The applicant was represented by an advocate; consequently, the application for production from jail was not entertained and stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl-743.16.sxw
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.743 OF 2016
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.742 OF 2016
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.410 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr. Mubin Solkar i/by Mr. Yusuf Sabbir Mithi for the Applicant in Application No.743 of 2016 and 742 of 2016.
Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 1st JULY, 2016
P.C.
an Advocate and hence, the application for production of the applicant from jail need not be entertained. Accordingly, the same is disposed of.
1 of 1
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court