Dismissed

Raju S/O Babulal Dange and Another (in Jail) v. State of Maharashtra, through P.S. P.S.O. Kalamana, Nagpur

Bombay HC21 Jun 2016APPA/671/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal application sought suspension of sentence and bail. The bench held that detailed evidence examination was unnecessary at this stage. Based on a prima facie view of the record, the conviction and recovery of incriminating material were considered proved. Consequently, the prayer was rejected.

What did the court decide?

The prayer for suspension of sentence and grant of bail was rejected.

Raju S/O Babulal Dange and Another (in Jail) Vs State of… — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

apeal222.15.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶3

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 222/2015

¶4

Raju s/o Babulal Dange and other ..vs.. State of Maharashtra through PSO P. S. Kalamna, Nagpur

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

- - - - Mr. A. K. Bhangde, Advocate for appellant. Mr. M. J. Khan, A.P.P. for respondent.

¶7

CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 21, 2016

¶8

CRIMINAL APPLICATIONI NO.671/2015

¶9

Heard.

¶10

The applicants have approached this Court for suspension of sentence and for the relief of bail.

¶11

As held by the Apex Court, detailed elaboration of the evidence at this stage would neither be in the interest of the accused nor the prosecution.

¶12

However, from the material placed on record, prima facie, it cannot be said that the order of conviction passed by the learned trial Judge has been passed on no evidence. Prima facie, the learned trial Judge has come to the conclusion that the prosecution has proved the circumstances of last seen together as well as recovery of incriminating material on the memorandum under Section 27 of the Indian evidence Act.

¶13

In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to consider the prayer for suspension of sentence and for grant of bail. The application is, therefore, rejected.

¶14

JUDGE JUDGE

¶15

kahale

Raju S/O Babulal Dange and Another (in Jail) v. State of Maharashtra, through P.S. P.S.O. Kalamana, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju S/O Babulal Dange and Another (in Jail) v. State of Maharashtra, through P.S. P.S.O. Kalamana, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sambhu Ramchandra Uikey (in Jail) Vs the D.I.G. Prison (E) (R), Nagpur and Others

Sachin S/O Shripat Lokhande (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Bhivapur, Nagpur

Sachin S/O Ambadas Dhawale Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Department of Home, Mumbai and Others

Dayanand S/O Daulat More and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Amadapur, Buldhana

Anand Bajirao Warthe Vs State of Maharashtra, through Home Department, Mumbai and Others

Subhash S/O Pundlikrao Khakse and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Superintendent of Police, A.C.B. Amravati and Another