This Criminal Appeal was filed with a 124-day delay by a convict in jail challenging a Sessions Court conviction. The High Court condoned the delay and ordered the registration of the appeal, while the State representative waived notice.
Delay condoned; Criminal Appeal registered. Notice to respondent waived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1312appa652.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 652 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2016
(Siddhu Gariba Verma vs. The State of Maharashtra thr. PSO, Khaparkheda PS, Nagpur)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,_____________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DECEMBER 13, 2016.
Heard Shri R.M. Daruvala, learned counsel (appointed) for the applicant and Shri V.P. Maldhure, learned APP for the respondent.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2016
Heard respective parties.
Admit . Call for R. & P.
Shri Maldhure, learned APP waives notice for the respondent.
JUDGE JUDGE
*GS.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay of 124 days in filing Criminal Appeal under Section 374 CrPC be condonable given that the appellant is in jail.
Whether the Criminal Appeal should be admitted for verification by the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siddhu Gariba Verma
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Indira Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
