High Court Criminal Bench, Nagpur held that a flight risk or denial of justice was not demonstrated considering the trial court's evidence and reasoning, thus rejecting the bail application.
`null`
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application [APPA] No. 34 of 2016 IN
Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2016 [Devendra Madhukarrao Rudrakar Vs. State of Mah.]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. D.A. Sonwane, Adv. [appointed] for the applicant. Mrs. Geeta Tiwari, APP for respondent.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 07th June, 2016
Heard.
Taking into consideration the nature of evidence and the reasonings as given by the learned Trial Judge, we do not find that a case is made out for grant of bail.
Bail Application is rejected.
Judge Judge
|hedau|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case is made out for grant of bail considering the evidence and reasoning of the trial judge.
Devendra Madhukarrao Rudrakar
State of Mah.
B. R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
