In criminal appeals criminal applications filed by three accused persons for Bail were disposed off as infructuous due to the decision in main appeals
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mis_applications in g32)05.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Cr. Application No. 485 OF 2010 IN
Cr. Appeal NO. 675 OF 2005
Bhimu Rudrappa Basargi Age 40 yrs., Occ.: Tailor, R/o. Village, Aasangi Turk, Taluka-Jath, District Sangli (At present lodged at Yerwada Central Prison, Pune) ...Applicant (accused No.37)
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
WITH Cr. Application No. 1048 OF 2010 IN Cr. Appeal NO. 678 OF 2005
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
WITH
Cr. Application No. 1280 OF 2015 (for early hearing) IN Cr. Appeal NO. 677 OF 2005
Shrikant Pargonda Basargi
...Applicant (accused No.41)
1 of 2
Megha
mis_applications in g32)05.doc
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Dr. Yug Mohit Chaudhry with Ms Parijat Bhardwaj for accused Nos.3, 9 ,11 and 12, 34 and 37
Mr. Amit Sale for orig. accused No.1, 4, 14, 16, 17, 18, 24, 25, 29, 36 Mr. Shekhar Ingawale for orig. accused Nos.7 and 20, 23. Mr. S.K. Shinde PP with Mr. H.J. Dedia, A.P.P. for State.
Mr. Niteen Pradhan i/b. Ms S.D. Khot and Ms Ameeta Kuttikrishnan for orig. accused Nos.2, 6,13, 28, 41.
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
ORDER : 7th OCTOBER, 2016
P.C.:-
In view of judgment dated 7th October, 2016 in main appeals,
these applications do not survive, hence disposed of as infructuous.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 of 2
Megha
Bhimu Rudrappa Basargi
Shrishail Basappa Basargi
Shrikant Pargonda Basargi
State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhulessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
