The High Court rejected the second criminal application on merit as a earlier similar one had already been rejected on merits, ordering expedited hearing of the underlying appeal.
Application rejected; appeal hearing expedited and fixed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08-APPA-1261-16.odt
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1261 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.477 OF 2015
Pramod Dattatraya Jadhav
.... Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Ganesh Gole, advocate i/b. Ritesh Ratnam, advocate for the applicant.
Mr.P.H. Gaikwad Patil, APP for the State/respondent.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR, J. DATE : 21st NOVEMBER, 2016
P.C. :
as well as learned APP.
Nesarikar
08-APPA-1261-16.odt
2 / 2
ORDER
(A.M. BADAR, J.)
Nesarikar
Pramod Dattatraya Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
