Application seeking expedition of hearing for Criminal Appeals No. 873, 734, and 735 of 2013. Court permitted addition of appeals to Final Hearing Board commencing 26th September, 2016.
Appeals added to Final Hearing Board commencing 26th September, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.APPA1077_2016.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1077 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 873 OF 2013
Aazar Azim Shaikh ... Applicant/Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 734 OF 2013
Dharmendra Paras Chauhan ... Appellant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 735 OF 2013
Ravindra Mishri Chauhan ... Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Ms. Heena Suvarnakar i/b. Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State. Ms. Racheeta Dhuru, Advocate for the appellants.
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2016
P.C.:
This is an Application for expediting the hearing of Criminal Appeal
No. 873 of 2013.
1 / 2
10.APPA1077_2016.doc
applicant to file paper book within eight weeks from the date of order. Liberty was given to urge for a fixed date of hearing. At present it is not possible to give a fixed date of hearing. Looking to the fact that paper book is ready, the Appeals to be added to the Final Hearing Board in the week commencing from 26th September, 2016.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Appeals can be added to the Final Hearing Board.
Aazar Azim Shaikh
Dharmendra Paras Chauhan
Ravindra Mishri Chauhan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
