Criminal applications challenging interim orders in criminal appeals were rejected. The court considered a request to stay the hearing of the parent appeals and rejected the prayer in light of the arguments and stage of the appeals.
Stay of hearing of the appeals was rejected; the criminal applications were rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7. CRI APPA 1066-16 & ORS.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1066 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 487 OF 2010
Radheshyam Bhagwandas Shah ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1068 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1020 OF 2009
Jaswant Chatur Nai & Ors. ... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1071 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1021 OF 2009
Raju Babulal Soni & Anr. ... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1072 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1022 OF 2009
Govindbhai Nai & Anr. ... Applicants Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
7. CRI APPA 1066-16 & ORS.doc
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1075 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1023 OF 2009
Kesharbhai Khimabhai Vahonia & Ors. ... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr. H.H. Ponda i/b. H.P. Shah, Advocate for the applicants in all the applications.
Mr. H.S. Venegavkar for CBI.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for respondent/State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2016.
P.C.:
above applications whereby the applications came to be
rejected, learned counsel for the applicants sought stay of hearing of all the appeals. Considering the arguments,
nature of evidence in the appeals and stage of the appeals,
we are not inclined to grant stay, hence, the prayer for stay
is rejected.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for stay of hearing of the criminal appeals should be granted pending consideration of the criminal applications.
Radheshyam Bhagwandas Shah & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
