Disposed
Panna Atmaram Bhansali. v. Tinoo M. Bhansali and Anr.
Bombay HCAPP/675/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
APP/675/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.675 OF 2012 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.44 OF 1983 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.37 OF 1982
Panna Atmaram Bhansali …. Appellant.
V/s
Tinoo Mansen Bhansali ….. Respondent.
Mr. Rohan Cama i/b M/s. Dastur Dadich & Kalambi & Associates for the Appellant.
Ms. Geeta Shastri for the Respondent.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE: 15th January, 2016
P.C.:-
2/2
APP/675/2012
Judge is accordingly set aside and the same is replaced by the Consent Terms signed by both the parties and their respective advocates which are notarized in USA and also in India. Undertaking given by both the parties in the said Consent Terms is accepted.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
bdpps
Panna Atmaram Bhansali
Tinoo Mansen Bhansali
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court