The High Court of Bombay disposed of the appeal in terms of consent terms agreed upon by the parties without prior judicial intervention regarding the impugned agreement.
The appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms marked as Annexure 'X'. The notice of motion is disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
skc
3-APP-506-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 506 OF 2016 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 462 OF 2015 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2483 OF 2016 IN APPEAL NO. 506 OF 2016
Supreme Infrastructure India Limited versus M/s. Balajee Infratech & Constructions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
.. Appellant
.. Respondents
Mr. Chetan Kapadia with Neville M and Shaista Pathan for Appellant. Mr. M. S. Roy i/b. Gauri Rao for Respondent.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C. J. AND M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 19 DECEMBER 2016
P.C.:
1] The parties have placed on record consent terms, which is marked as Annexure 'X' for the purpose of identification. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
2] In view of disposal of the appeal, notice of motion (l) no. 2483 of 2016 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
chandka
1 of 1
Supreme Infrastructure India Limited
M/s. Balajee Infratech & Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
