The High Court disposed of an appeal on withdrawal, citing Apex Court law, keeping merits open, and held that a linked Notice of Motion does not survive the withdrawal.
Appeal disposed of as withdrawn; liberty to adopt appropriate remedy granted; contended merits kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
appl-242-16
upk
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL (L) NO.242 OF 2016 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.72 OF 2012 IN SUIT NO.254 OF 2011 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L)NO. 1917 OF 2016 IN APPEAL (L) NO.242 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Mr.A.M.Sarogi for the Appellant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 4TH JULY 2016
P.C.: (Not on Board. Taken on Board)
. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Midnapore Peoples' Co-op. Bank Ltd. v/s. Chunilal Nanda1 , learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in accordance with law as regards the impugned order dated 24 June 2016.
1 2006 (5) SCC 399
2appl-242-16
upk
(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Midnapore Peoples' Co-op. Bank Ltd. v/s. Chunilal NandaFollowed¶10
Midnapore Peoples' Co-op. Bank Ltd. v/s. Chunilal Nanda (2006 (5) SCC 399) · Who else cites this
Appellant
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court